Jun 1, 2018

Linda Howe's Wild Speculation and Alien Hype


Further weaved is the mythos of the alleged Naczca alien mummy by none other than sensationalist Linda Moulton Howe.  Just as Howe did with the bogus Roswell UFO metal, she spins a tale connecting ancient history, geography, the Nazca lines, alien hybrids, and more with a splash of nonsense and sensationalism.

(Note: The word mummy is used throughout this piece to avoid having to write bogus alien mummy over and over.)

This time DNA testing alleged to have been conducted showing that the mummy is 95% primate and 5% unknown, there is a mysterious friction ridge pattern on the mummy fingers, and...wait for it...a secret location with more mummies and artifacts!  You can read the series at Howe's website.

Howe's latest article series has to do with Steve Mara of Phenomena Magazine.  Mara claims to have traveled to a place holding other alien mummies, but does not know the location because he was taken there in secret - but he was shown photographs of a tomb with alien hieroglyphics.  The apparent lack of a visible naval or breasts on the mummy prompted Howe to say during her interview with Mara, "Steve, you said there was no apparent naval.  That would suggest that Maria (the so-called Nazca mummy) is some kind of android."

Howe also posts a photo showing two fingers from the mummy with dermal ridges (aka friction ridges), and claims the ridges are straight thus making this somehow all the more mysterious.  It doesn't.  Howe tries to stretch this out by showing a drawing only showing three basic types of fingerprint patterns when there are actually nine type variations including some where friction ridges can appear to be straight.

Above: Photo showing two fingers of mummy as appearing on Earthfiles.com.  Photo used for comparison and critique.

The photo becomes useless for any sort of analysis because there is no photomacrographic scale in the photo to determine the actual size of the fingers and ridge area.  The other problem is that the photo was taken with the fingers at an angle, does not indicate if this is the right or left hand, and does not accurately reflect the curvature of the surface or friction ridges.

On the finger in the foreground of the mummy, you can see as you look lower that the friction ridges do indeed begin to curve and are not all straight as Howe claims.  You can also see the finger in the background has curving friction ridges, not straight ridges as Howe claims.

The other thing one needs to take into account is that the skin is dehydrated and this will cause the friction ridges to lose shape.  The photo below demonstrates what is known as postmortem skin slippage.  Note the fingertips where there appear to be indentations, dimpling, or shriveling of the skin.  While not as apparent as in the photo below, this effect is evident on the fingers in the mummy photo above.


When slippage or dehydration of the fingertips occurs postmortem, the friction ridges will lose their original shape including curvature.  In obtaining prints from a deceased subject, one method involves injecting liquid into the hands to help plump the hands up to as close to their original shape as possible.

The following friction ridge impression from a human finger shows flat line dermal ridges.  As with the mummy finger photo, we are only seeing part of the print and the image has been angled.


Below is the original print prior to being rotated.  While this may only be a 2D representation of a print, I think it demonstrates how a simple angle can impact how something is represented.  And, yes, human prints can also have straight friction ridges.
Combine the angle of the photo, no scale for measurement, the effects on the skin postmortem, and what we have is speculation, not proof.

More speculation comes from Howe asking if the mummy could be an "alien hybird" and goes on in the second part of the article series to suggest that some dimpling found on the skin of the mummy might be reptilian.  Howe doesn't use that particular word, but it is clear what she implies in the article.  Howe then delves into Greek mythology about a hybrid snake/human god called Glykon.

But Howe doesn't stop her inference there, she throws in Babylonian demons and comes full circle about EBE's and aliens having allegedly altered human evolution by manipulating DNA.

Howe's interview of Mara includes him talking about those in possession of the mummy putting an asking price of $1,000,000 on the mummy and subsequently asking for $20,000 for other mummies in their possession.

But wait, there's more!  Mara heard rumors of someone from Japan allegedly buying metal from the same tomb the mummy is alleged to have come from, and the metal reverts to its original shape when bent.  ROSWELL!  A mysterious warehouse full of other alien mummies!  Underground civilizations!  And so it goes...

Looks like Mara is no longer in touch with the lab that did this latest claimed DNA work since he won't fork up $15,000 for continued testing and Maria the mummy has also vanished.

The mere fact that grave robbing and cobbling together fake mummies from body parts and plastering them is noting new in Peru and what appears to be some shady grave robbers asking for big bucks, I don't think it takes much to put this all together as a scam.

Speculation and sensationalism do not equate to science, but don't tell Linda Howe that.  Let's be clear that the DNA test commissioned by Gaia.com came back and showed the mummy was 100% human.  In usual Howe fashion, she fails to mention the below report.


Linda Howe also fails to disclose in the article on her website promoting the mummy that she is the host of a show on Gaia.com's subscription service called (ironically) Truth Hunter.

So far what there is evidence of is nothing more than sensationalism, speculation, and a poor attempt at tying in the alien mythos at every turn by throwing out UFO hot button words.

This is where we hit the wall with these cases where UFO sensationalists, entrepreneurs, frauds, and hoaxers all come out to play but do not provide any solid, verifiable evidence.


May 22, 2018

Linda Howe Promotes Bogus UFO Metal...Again

ABOVE:  Photo of alleged Roswell UFO metal.

For those of you unfamiliar with the story, it goes like this: Back in the mid 1990s, now deceased radio host Art Bell claimed to have received a package containing metal pieces and a letter supposedly from a relative of a military member who was supposedly part of the UFO crash retrieval team from the infamous Roswell UFO crash.  Some of the metal wound up in the hands of Linda Moulton Howe who, to this day, continues to claim the metal has some extraordinary properties - we'll get to that in a minute.



In investigating the claim of this supposed mystery metal, Howe had the metal analyzed by a scientific technologist named Nicholas A. Reiter.  Howe had used Reiter on other cases and no issues with his findings - that is, until they did not start matching up with the claims being made.  Before we get to that, let's look at some of what Howe currently wrote on her Earthfiles.com website about the alleged Roswell UFO metal:



  • An exam found the first pieces of metal to be greater than 99% aluminum and of normal density.
  • Howe then says engineers at an aluminum manufacturer stated the aluminum pieces were not typical of industrial machining.  Howe goes to say there was speculation that military handlers may have "had samples from the alleged extraterrestrial craft punched out to distribute to American scientists for study."
  • Howe stated an exotic metals manufacturer in 1996 stated, "No one layers bismuth and magnesium.  It can't be done!  The layers won't bond with each other."
  • Howe writes she contacted the Director of Material Sciences at MIT, "but no one had any knowledge of such layered material."
  • Howe writes another expert stated, "I have basically exhausted every resource that I have ever tried to usein the past from 1940 to now.  I have found no reference, even in government research, for bismuth/magnesium layers."

Problem is that bismuth and magnesium will indeed bond with each other, as you will see.

Howe goes on to do what she seems to do best, inserting bits from other stories or claims in an attempt to bolster the mysterious and possible extraterrestrial origin of the metal.  Howe cites a member of the Navy supposedly seeing photos of Roswell alien bodies, she cites the infamous Colonel Corso's "understanding of UFO propulsion, and tags her go to classic of extraterrestrial biological entity into the series of articles.

Howe cites how one researcher put a large amount of electrical current through the metal and it allegedly floated to the side.  Howe touted this in interviews on late night radio as something amazing.  Truth is, if you subject a soft drink or beer can to a large electrical current it too will move.  Then again, the simple truth just isn't as sexy as aliens and doesn't sell subscriptions to Howe's website.

In the end what you have are some pieces of metal and a lot of speculation or, if you prefer, promotion.

In August 1996, four months after the metal pieces were made public, scientific technologist Nicholas A. Reiter had been asked directly by Linda Moulton Howe (pictured right) to study some of the bismuth/magnesium metal.  Linda Howe never made this report public and one must ask why she chose to not share it.  In Howe's recent and ongoing articles on the supposed mysterious metal, she never once mentions the report below.  Now she has a chance since the series of articles is ongoing, though it be doubtful she will.  This isn't the first time Howe has discounted scientific work that does not fit the narrative she is promoting.


First draft presented to Linda Moulton Howe
07 August 1996
Nicholas A. Reiter
Updated November 30, 2001

The following report appears here for the first time, at least in it's original form. It represents a most interesting adventure in the realm of UFO detective work. Some readers may recall the on-going debate on the Art Bell show back in 1996 and 1997 relating to the claimed fragment of the crashed Roswell saucer. Research into the claimed artifact was hosted and managed by author and UFO personality Linda Moulton Howe. Linda had partitioned the fragment presented to Art Bell into smaller sections that were then analyzed at assorted labs around the country. NR was one of the chosen. As the reader will see, we had a bit of a leg up on this one.

The metal sample was eventually returned to Linda Howe, though we retain a very tiny fragment to this day, with her permission. While our analysis of the sample by SEM and EDS spectroscopy agreed with that performed at the other labs, our opinion of the origin of the sample did not represent the final "verdict" that appeared to win out on Art Bell's show, or later literary references. We were, and remain, skeptical for reasons that will become apparent. Following the text of the report is a short update. Read on, and remember that nothing is as it seems…

I. Overview
On 12 July, 1996, I received by Fed Ex a small metal artifact from LMH. The purported origin of this piece, as well as highlights of previous analytical work, had been revealed to me by LMH in earlier telephone conversations. Along with the artifact portion, I received several color photographs of the parent artifact, as well as some SEM photos, and a written summary of previous EDS and SIMS work. After personal viewing by me, the original photos were sent back to LMH.
From 12 July to the present, I have performed numerous simple tests and analytical operations on the sample. The results of these tests, to date, are summarized here.

II. Physical Characteristics
The artifact appears to be a small chunk of lightweight metal, sawed or micro-tomed from a larger parent piece. It is irregular in contour, and measured (as received) about 22mm x 4mm x 6mm. Of the two non-cut sides, one is of a silvery colour, textured with many small convex "bumps". The other side is of a gold- black colour, with a fluted surface; a concave "negative" of the silvery side topography. Upon handling, a thin (about 1mm thick) portion delaminated from the original piece. This smaller portion broke away along a line following the contour of the primary piece. The smaller portion retained the characteristics of silvery and blackish sides, with the now exposed surface of the large portion being silvery - convex. The smaller fragment was reserved for destructive testing.
Initial visual inspection, along with inspection of the photos of the parent artifact, shows a clear columnar structure along with discrete bands or layers. The artifact, overall, appears to be quite brittle. An end of the thin delaminated portion was easily snapped off with finger pressure.
The overall appearance of the piece, and it’s parent, strongly suggests rapid epitaxial growth.
A Jeol JSM - T330 SEM was used to examine portions of the smaller artifact fragment. Photos taken showed features quite similar to those seen previously during recent analysis carried out at another midwestern location. The layering effect is quite noticeable. Crystal structure of the light grey metal, composing the thicker layers, is indeterminate visually. Original SEM photos taken at this location have been forwarded to LMH for use with this summary.

III. Composition and Chemical Properties
A Tracor Northern 5400 EDS X ray analyzer was used to examine compositions of both silvery and blackish regions. The silvery region is shown to be relatively pure Mg, with a small signal for Zn; perhaps indicating about 2 to 3% of the latter. The blackish region appears to be primarily Bi. Please reference attached EDS print-outs. Again, this corroborates results from earlier EDS and SIMS work done elsewhere.
A small crumb of the artifact was held by tweezers over a hydrogen torch flame. It ignited and burned with the characteristic white flare of Mg. A small curl of 99.99% Mg was likewise ignited for comparison. Both appeared to burn identically.

IV. Nuclear Properties
The larger artifact portion was tested with a Baird Atomic 914-434 Ratemeter (Geiger Counter). No indications of radioactivity were noted.
Questions had been raised by LMH as to whether the materials in the artifact were of common (predominant or stable) isotope. The only testing possible at this location for this purpose was a simple Archimedian volume versus weight test. The volume of the large artifact portion was determined by displacement of water in a pipette. Correcting for estimated volumes of Zn and Bi, a calculated weight was derived for the artifact, given the textbook densities for Mg24 , Zn, and Bi. This value was calculated to be .5155g. The artifact was then weighed with a Stanton CL1 lab balance, and actual weight over three trials was found to be .5115g, about 0.7% lighter than the calculated value. From this, we may say that the artifact, while possibly containing small percentages of heavier Mg isotopes, does not appear to be primarily composed of Mg25 or Mg26.

V. Electrical Properties
The artifact appears to be quite conductive; and in any orientation, has a resistance too low to measure with a typical ohm-meter.
A Fluke 79 DVM was used to look for any voltage potentials or currents which (by some hypotheses) might be produced by the layering of dissimilar metals or other more unusual mechanisms. None were detected in the range of the meter.

VI. Magnetic Properties
The artifact was tested with a custom - built Hall effect gaussmeter. No discernable magnetic field was noted. The artifact was not seen to be attracted by a NdFeB magnet.
It had been suggested that the layered structure of the artifact resembled proposed structures for high temperature filamentary superconductors. A small NdFeB super magnet was used in an attempt to elicit a Meissner Effect reaction with the artifact, both at room temperature, and in a beaker of liquid nitrogen. No effect was noticed.

VII. Testing for Unusual Properties
The artifact was radiated with light from a .5mW 670nm diode laser, at various angles. No unusual effects or responses were noted.

The artifact was radiated with light from a 100watt long wave ultraviolet lamp. No fluorescence or unusual response was noted.

The artifact was suspended within an electrical field of about 3 to 4 kV at 20 kHz. No unusual responses were noted.

It had been suggested to LMH that the artifact structure was possibly indicative of a hypothetical propulsion system, and that extremely high DC potentials applied to the metal structure would cause it to lose weight! To test this idea, the artifact was mounted on a plastic stand, which in turn was placed on a Mettler BasBal 2400 digital lab balance. A very thin lead wire was attached to the artifact with a snippet of conductive tape, and then connected to a HV source. Two sources were used, a +/- 15,000V DC, 60VA supply (GE 9T63Y2226G2) and a small Van De Graaf generator providing about 30 to 50 kV electrostatic potential.

In either case, no weight changes within the resolution of the balance (10mg) were noted when the HV sources were turned on. However, according to LMH’s source, potentials over 1MV might be needed to cause weight loss (?!).

VIII. Conclusions
At the most basic of levels, we would freely state that the artifact portion provided by LMH does NOT seem to be composed of elements or compounds which are unknown. Nor is it composed of alloys that appear to be of a purity or combination beyond the scope of current material science. The artifact bears a strong resemblance to irregular layered residue often found in large physical vapor deposition (PVD) coaters. This family of filming processes includes sputtering, E-beam, and resistively heated thermal evaporation; all common vacuum processes used widely in industry. The structure of the artifact very strongly suggests long term, high rate, disordered epitaxial growth on a cold surface (chilled evaporant shield? chamber walls?).

I have spent nearly 12 years working in the thin film and vacuum process fields. Some years ago, I worked as a technician for a company in Ohio that ran the world’s largest commercial E-beam coater. One of my duties was to remove chromium residue from the areas around the large E-beam evaporation sources. Hundreds of pounds of chips, flakes, and chunks of columnar layered chromium residue were removed at a time. (Usually weekends - third shift!) If I had not known the composition of the artifact when first viewing the colour photos of it, I would have honestly guessed that someone had done me the honor of saving a souvenir from my old job- a chrome residue chunk from the focus magnet pole piece of an Airco Temescal E-beam source! Rough calculations, coupled with past work experience would hint that residues of the thickness of the artifact represent 80 to 120 hours of build up time, in your typical large sputter or E-beam coater. We used to chip ours out every two weeks or so.

The composition of the Mg:Zn alloy comes close to several commercial Mg alloys: ASTM#’s ZK60A, ZK51A, and EZ33A. All of these alloys, however, are said to have a very small quantity of Zr, typically 0.5% to 0.7%. I have been informed that Zr was not seen in earlier EDS scans at other locations, nor did it seem to be evident in my analysis of the artifact. However, I do also know that at least for our TN 5400, resolution below about 1% is usually not possible. Zr may have simply been below the resolution of the EDS. (Information from The Mechanical Engineers Handbook, 1958 edition, McGraw Hill Book Co.)

It is also evident that the artifact does not, at least in it’s current state of condition, seem to produce any voltages or currents, nor does it act as a superconductor, at least at room temperature or at 77K.
The remaining unusual aspect of the artifact is quite simply the combination of Mg and Bi in a single structure. Mg, of course, finds most use in the automotive and aerospace industry, as a lighter weight substitute for aluminum. It may also be used to make some optical grade films or plating. Bi, on the other hand, has several unusual properties that suit it to more specialized high tech applications. It is often a component in solders and is added to some lower temperature cast-able alloys because it has the characteristic of expanding about 2 to 3 percent upon cooling. It is used in thermoelectric power modules or Peltier coolers along with tellurium. It is the most diamagnetic element known, and the most electro-negative. A patent by Carroll claims Bi as a possible filamentary superconductor at high temperatures. Bi is itself super-conducting at low temperatures.

To date, I have been unable to find any references to uses of Mg and Bi together in one process or product! LMH has claimed that officials at Dow, one of the largest Mg producers in the world, are unaware of any use of Bi in their manufacturing processes.

Of course, this is not to say that there is not some very specialized use of Mg in a Bi application, or vica versa, we have simply not found it yet in our "detective work".

My own opinion is that the artifact probably represents a curious piece of industrial by-product from the thin films industry or a Mg casting plant. However, until a match-up is found, I will not rule out the possibility of a more unusual origin.

Notes, as of November 2001:
In the year or so that followed the analysis by us of this sample, the mythos and mystery of the bismuth - magnesium artifact continued to grow. It became the source for a wide range of speculations, some valid, some baseless, among the anti-gravity and UFO research sub-cultures. The extraterrestrial origin of the artifact appeared to be firmly entrenched in the minds of most who listened, read, and believed. Presumably, there just aren't very many old films and vacuum technology folks out there…

Claims were made by a Tesla coil enthusiast in Alabama that the portion of the artifact in his possession acted strangely and tried to levitate in the presence of the electrostatic field of a Van de Graaf generator and a radio frequency source. We did perform a separate replication here, and found that our metal fragment danced about as well in the field of a Van de Graaf. And so did a piece of aluminum foil! Please understand that just about any small unattached mass will dance in the field of a 200,000 volt source! The mythos grew…

In 2000, one last revelation came our way on the origin of the artifact. The combination of bismuth and magnesium had eluded us for four years. But then one day, we found a reference to an obscure industrial process used in the refinement of lead. The process, called the Betterton-Krohl Process, uses molten magnesium floated over the surface of liquid lead. The magnesium sucks up, or pulls bismuth impurities out of the lead! Often, the magnesium is used over and over again…
Could this little known process have been the real origin of some unusual looking metal residue, that was then in turn promoted as a piece of alien technology?

#lindamoultonhowe #lindahowe #roswell #ufo #ufometal #fakeufo

Apr 5, 2018

This call is from a federal prison

Click on the image below for The Morton Files...

Some people get on the wrong side of the law and make a change.  Others?  Not so much.  Sean David Morton has reared his ugly head from the bowels of a federal prison and is back on his old schtick spouting on about predictions, how evil people on the Internet are after him, hawking his wares, how his self published book is just oh so dangerous that it was the real reason he's in prison.

The truth of the matter is simple: Morton and his wife victimized desperate people and defrauded the government out of nearly $500,000.00, even after being warned to desist their illegal activities, and that's what landed him in prison.  The only conspiracy afoot was the one Morton and his wife hatched to con people out of their money and line their own pockets. 


Apr 3, 2018

Alleged Alien Body is Human, Greer (Again) Claims Conspiracy

In case you missed the news, the Atacama body promoted by UFO quack Steven Greer as being an alien being turned out to be 100% human.  This conclusion was reached after five years of scientific work from a variety of experts, including Dr. Garry Nolan of To The Stars Academy.



But science isn't enough to quell the conspiratorial ramblings of Steven Greer, even though he chose the scientist himself.  This reminds one of Linda Howe quickly dismissing the very terrestrial findings of scientists she chose to examine a bogus case she was promoting.



Greer promoted the Atacama being as extraterrestrial and wove quite a tale around how the body was found and came into his possession.  Greer held a crowd funding campaign and raised quite a bit of money to make a film entitled Sirius about the Atacama body.  While the film went on to promote the alien origin of the body, scientific examination has proved otherwise.



Does Greer concede to the scientific proof and move on?  Nope.  Greer, in the video below, now claims the results of the study on the Atacama body were manipulated by the CIA.  Of course, Greer has no proof of this and went as far to throw Dr. Garry Nolan and others involved under the bus in an attempt to paint them as incompetent puppets of an evil government.



Greer has to have the conspiracy in all he does, otherwise he has no way to promote himself or his wacky claims.  Truth does not serve Greer's interests.  There are enough idiots out there who are more satisfied with other idiots selling them on conspiracies because the truth simply isn't enough.  Just take a look at the comments section of the video on YouTube and you'll quickly see how easy it is to sell conspiratorial bullshit to people.



Greer says in the video the majority of the population doesn't trust the media.  Well, at least Greer has something in common with the media.  The sad truth here is that Greer's stunt backfired and this is all about damage control and keeping the faithful on the hook by cooking up yet another conspiracy.



But the story doesn't end with Greer babbling nonsense.  It looks like the Chilean government is investigating if the body was illegally exhumed.



ufowatchdog.com would like to thank Dr. Garry Nolan for his work on uncovering the truth about the Atacama being.  No thanks to Greer for trying to keep his mythology and paranoid rambling relevant.










Jan 10, 2018

Sir, is this a court of record?


"Sir, is this a court of record?"
"I don't understand a thing that's going on here, Your Honor."
"What does any of that mean, sir?"
-- Self proclaimed "legal and Constitutional expert" Sean David to the judge presiding over his criminal sentencing hearing.

SEE BOTTOM OF POST FOR AN UPDATE

I was just sent a copy of the transcript from Sean David Morton's criminal sentencing - you can read it here.  If you're unaware, Sean David Morton was sentenced to 72 months in federal prison last September for his part in a scheme to defraud the IRS, including receiving a nearly $500,000 return based on a fraudulent tax return he filed.  His wife was sentenced to 24 months.

The transcript is a dizzying read where Morton appears to have gone on for over an hour trying to convince a judge to not send him to prison.  Morton threw it all out there trying to convince the judge that he shouldn't go to prison because...

- Morton helped get Ronald Reagan elected president.
- Morton was responsible for dropping the murder rate from 66 to zero in a bad area of Los Angeles.
- Morton used his bogus PhD to allegedly counsel at risk youth.
- Morton "lived an exemplary life".
- Morton did social work with a former USC football coach .

Morton even laid out his old and bogus claim of having lived in Nepal with the Dali Lama and a new one I had never heard him make; that his great, great grandfather was John Morton whom was one of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence.  Morton is a proven liar and this simply sounds like more of his nonsense.  Someone told me Morton once claimed he was the heir to the Morton salt fortune.

Morton alleges to be a "legal and Constitutional expert" yet he does not know federal criminal court is a court of record.  Morton does not have a legal degree or a license to practice law and it is clear he does not know how basic court procedures work. 

There was one interesting bit that came out of Morton's mouth during the sentencing; Morton has claimed that his streaming Internet radio show was the number one show on the Internet.  The presiding judge asked Morton how large his audience was to which Morton responded, "It's an Internet radio show, we have no real way of knowing."  Then how do you know it's number one?  It never was.

Way too much in the transcript for me to cover in a post here, so you'll just have to read it on your own.

Click above to read what drove Sean David Morton to file a $1mil lawsuit and lose.

UPDATE:  Morton now has a public figure page on Facebook someone set up for him and the following message was posted:

"From Sean David Morton January 6, 2018:

Melissa needs help MORE THAN I DO....but whatever you can do for either of us would be greatly appreciated, and the LEGAL stuff is going VERY WELL, and we fully expect this case to be VOIDED OUT or overturned very SOON! WE DID NOTHING WRONG and we are all learning what CRIMINALS the DOJ ARE!"

Morton lists the inmate info for himself and his wife and is asking for money. This is just more of the same rhetoric Morton has been spewing about how the case is going to get tossed. Morton even said prior to trial that the case would not be going to court, yet it did. Again, how does someone claiming to be such an accomplished psychic/remote viewer not see this all coming?

The bottom line is that Morton is a predator who preyed upon the uninformed, the unsuspecting and the desperate for his own gain by charging people thousands of dollars they really didn't have but came up with out of pure desperation. Morton claimed during his sentencing that he was charging very little and taking donations, yet he clearly charged one person $2500 and an elderly couple couple $10,000 claiming he could erase their debt through a bonding process. It didn't work, Morton kept the money, and the husband in the elderly couple passed away leaving his widow more burdened. Plainly put, Morton is a scumbag of the lowest order who never accepted any responsibility for his actions. He's stooped to lying, victim blaming, and pointing the finger at everyone else for his actions.

Dec 15, 2017

Stan Romanek Sentenced to 2 Years in Halfway House

Alleged alien abductee Stan Romanek (pictured left), who was found guilty of possessing child pornography last August, was sentenced yesterday to serve two years in a halfway house.  Romanek will also be on probation for a ten year period and is required to register as a sex offender.

Romanek was arrested by police in 2014 when a search warrant discovered hundreds of images of child pornography on Romanek's laptop computer.  Romanek entered a not guilty plea and the case went to trial resulting in him being found guilty of a single charge of possessing child pornography.

Romanek's wife initially announced they would be "bring UFOlogy into the courtroom" after claiming the laptop containing the child pornography images had been hacked as part of a scheme to discredit Romanek's UFO and alien claims.  However, neither UFOs nor aliens were used by Roamnek's attorney in his defense.

You can read more here.